← All cases
China · Mainland / Join & pass probation

“Cooperation” agreement versus employment: guiding case 179

Guiding case · appellate judgment; retrial application rejected

Case scope:Mainland China · Beijing · guiding case 179Appeal: 26 September 2018; retrial refusal: 30 April 2019

Reported facts

Nie Meilan signed a tea-project cooperation agreement but received monthly pay and worked under company management, including leave approval and attendance-linked pay.

Published outcome

Employment was recognised and wage and termination awards upheld. The appeal removed the double-wage award because the agreement itself served as a written employment contract.

Limits when comparing your own situation

Recognising employment and proving absence of a written contract are different issues. Neither the document’s title nor one monthly payment settles status alone.

Questions to prepare for your own situation

  • Who controls my duties, schedule and leave?
  • How do actual payments and business risk work?
  • What terms are already contained in the signed agreement?

These preparation questions are our editorial guidance, not findings in the original case.

References and editorial date

Supreme People’s Court

Source publication:2022-07-06

Source checked and summary prepared:2026-10-04

Our concise paraphrase is not an official translation or an assessment of your case. Reference addresses are recorded for traceability.

https://www.court.gov.cn/shenpan/xiangqing/364631.html

Report a correction →